What if Navigator was working for Darcy Allan Sheppard instead of Michael Bryant?

Although Darcy Allan Sheppard had no violent record and has only been accused and not convicted of cheque fraud, many in the media have portrayed him as someone who may be violent. He had no history of violence and no record of violence –none.

Much of Sheppard’s portrayal is driven by Bryant’s PR efforts with Brian Mulroney’s favourite spinners – Navigator Ltd.

Before Navigator started spinning the facts, the Globe and Mail described Sheppard as “admired by his co-workers for his charisma and adored by his friends and family for his comedy.”

Other media outlets spoke with people who knew him.

“You have to print the truth about him,” said courier Barry Ridley, who has worked as a courier for 39 years.

“Allan would go out of his way to help people. He was one of the nicest guys,” said Mr. Ridley.

“He was more of a fun loving guy,” echoed courier John Baker, adding it would be out of character for Mr. Sheppard to be the aggressor in a dispute with the driver of a vehicle.

What kind of articles would we be seeing if Navigator worked for Darcy Allan Sheppard instead of Michael Bryant?

Like Sheppard, Bryant does not have a violent record but he does have a violent hobby. Since he was 10 years old Bryant has been boxing. He’s been training to punch people and knock them out since he was a child.

In April the Globe and Mail quoted Bryant as saying “I always try to end a bout before the third round.” That means delivering a knockout blow to the other guy before Bryant himself loses steam.

In the heat of battle Bryant is described as “fierce,” … “a far cry from the genial and charming demeanour that has made him such a popular cabinet minister.”

Bryant goes on to describe boxing as a “very primal sport, one where you are given permission to hit someone.”

He emphasized “it also assisted in giving people the wrong impression that they better not mess with me –which, mercifully, was rarely tested.”

And he confesses that he hates to lose, “It’s humiliating to lose.”

Bryant is a self-described man of “serious gusto” who was no longer trapped by the need to watch his behaviour for political reasons. He bragged that outside of politics you didn’t need to keep you road rage in check, “you could give the bird to a neighbour who’s cut you off.”

Acquaintances insisted that his recent political downfall was in part because “he’d finally gone rogue.” And he was “no longer afraid of recrimination.”

His parliamentary assistant, David Zimmer noted that “he becomes very impatient when things bog down – you can see his feet vibrating on the floor when things aren’t moving fast enough.”

Toronto councillor Joe Mihevc, says that Bryant “wears his heart on his sleeve, and he’s a quick actor who knows how to intervene the moment it’s needed.”

When asked how he chooses as training partner Bryant once responded, “I would try and find the biggest chump I could so as to survive the experience.”

Is that how Bryant saw Darcy Allan Sheppard?

Michael Bryant

Michael Bryant

Was Bryant’s behaviour so out of control because he is a man of serious gusto who was impatient that he was bogged down in traffic and Sheppard wasn’t moving fast enough? Did Sheppard do something to humiliate him in front of his wife on their twelfth anniversary?

Was Sheppard Bryant’s biggest chump because Bryant thought he could survive the experience and because he was no longer afraid of recrimination?

Did events escalate so quickly that Bryant was trying to knock Sheppard off his car to deliver a knock out blow and end it before the third round?

The only fact that we do know is that Bryant did end it. He ended Darcy Allan Sheppard’s life.

6 Responses to What if Navigator was working for Darcy Allan Sheppard instead of Michael Bryant?

  1. Meaghan Edwards says:

    Yep, ticking time bomb.

  2. Canadian Mutt Owner says:

    “And he confesses that he hates to lose, “It’s humiliating to lose.””

    No kidding?

    Anyone who has read the Committee Hearings into Bill 132(where he stripped thousands of Ontario Citizens of the right to be presumed innocent)knows what lengths he will go to NOT to lose.

    I don`t know how anyone can think this man has any “credibility” after reading at least the OVMA testimony.

    Didn`t he come out after the Committee Hearings and say something to the effect of (Paraphrased)…I`m more convinced than ever that we need this law.


    Perhaps he`ll be more capable of telling the truth when he`s questioned under oath….let`s hope.

    I must say Mr Bryant, despite my animosity towards you for obvious reasons you ARE innocent until proven guilty in a Court of Law.

    Sadly there are many Ontario Citizens who are now guilty until proven innocent because of what you did while you were Attorney General of Ontario.

    Here`s just a couple of them


    I hope you see the error of your ways now.
    Telling the truth is ALWAYS more important than winning and EVERY Ontario citizen must be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    Have you contacted your MPP and Premier and asked for a repeal of your law yet Mr Bryant?

    It`s the least you can do.

    • nobody says:

      Bryant is a walking contradiction- His new job position has me thinking “conflict of interest”.

      I have a hard time believing he took his wife on their 12th anniversary to one of the cheapest restarants(as in plastic cutlery cheap)Why does this all sound wrong to me.Who was the blonde woman that was with him that night?
      Those are just a few questions I have going through my mind.

  3. Christne says:

    A Toronto woman was charged with aggravated assault after her father (who was “always been very mean and very abusive”) jumped on her car and she tried to drive off. He fell and broke his leg. “Her father, whose name has not been disclosed, wrote two letters asking the Crown to drop the charges against his daughter because the incident was his own “stupidity.”” The Crown is still pursuing THIS case even though the victim admits he was at fault but Bryant gets off! Unbelievable!


  4. nobody says:

    The fact that the case was put over several times shows me how complicated it was for Peck to drop the charges.

  5. Thank you!!!! 1000 times!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: