Ghomeshi v Bryant

April 24, 2016

 

IMG_GHB-1

After the trial and acquittal of Jian Ghomeshi much has been written and spoken regarding his lawyer Marie Henein and her work with another famous client, former Ontario Attorney General, Michael Bryant. In both cases the media attributed Henein’s success to her ability to find exculpatory evidence supporting her clients. The question that has not been addressed is why did Ghomeshi’s case go to trial but not Bryant’s?  Why did Henein reveal her entire defence to the Crown in Bryant’s case, in order to avoid a trial but not in Ghomeshi’s case?

 

The simple answer would be that Henein felt the evidence, against Jian Ghomeshi (including the exculpatory evidence she had uncovered) was stronger than the evidence against Michael Bryant. The Crown in Ghomeshi’s case went to trial because they believed they had a reasonable prospect of conviction. The Crown in Bryant’s case, represented by special prosecutor Richard Peck and his Ontario agent Mark Sandler determined that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction.

 

Both defendants had the same lawyer, so let’s compare the strength of the evidence in each case.

Read the rest of this entry »


Witness against the prosecution—Part III

March 5, 2016

III   Reasonable doubt? Or unreasonable certainty? As usual for me, this post is long—extra-long in this case because I have included extensive notes with almost twice as many words as the main tex…

Source: Witness against the prosecution—Part III


Witness against the prosecution—Part II

February 10, 2016

28 Questions

II – Enlightened justice at the end of the tunnel? Or darkness?

In recalling the advice of Lord Mansfield (See Part I) Prof. Sen does not argue against giving reasons for official decisions; his book is an extended argument for full disclosure in the public interest and in the cause of justice.

He precedes his example from Lord Mansfield with this:

The avoidance of reasoned justification often comes not from indignant protesters but from placid guardians of order and justice. Reticence has appealed throughout history to those with a governing role, endowed with public authority, who are unsure of their grounds for action, or unwilling to scrutinize the basis of their policies.[Emphasis added.] 

And he follows it with this:

(Lord Mansfield’s pragmatic counsel) may be good advice for tactful governance, but it is surely no way of guaranteeing that the right things…

View original post 3,042 more words


Witness against the prosecution, Part I

February 8, 2016

Source: Witness against the prosecution, Part I


WHY DID MICHAEL BRYANT WAIT THREE MINUTES TO CALL 911?

October 22, 2015

On August 31, 2009, former Ontario Attorney General, Michael Bryant was involved in a road rage attack that killed cyclist Darcy Allan Sheppard. Bryant was arrested that evening but he did not make a statement to police. He would not make a statement until almost eight months later when he and his lawyers received complete and full disclosure of the Crown’s case. Bryant did however make a 911 call to police. After he successfully knocked Darcy Allan Sheppard off his car with a fire hydrant, Bryant fled to the Hyatt Hotel on Avenue Road just north of Bloor. It became the staging area for his defence.

BryantSaabHyatt

Bryant described his actions in his book, “28 Seconds”

“So I turned right on Avenue Road and drove into the hotel’s circular driveway and found, I thought, sanctuary. I stopped the car and pulled up the emergency brake-for what would be the final time. I couldn’t find my cell phone. Susan offered hers.”

In a video interview with the Toronto Star, he said: “And so I pulled over and called 911. It was… police need to come and protect us.”

In his CBC interview with Amanda Lang he said: “So I drove in and called 911 and ah said, help, bring police..”

His lawyer, Marie Henein wrote in her article, “Split Seconds Matter,” “He drove to safety just around the corner to a hotel and called 911.”

What’s missing from all of these descriptions is that when Michael Bryant drove to the Hyatt Hotel, in what he described as a state of fear, he did not call 911 right away. He waited three minutes!

Read the rest of this entry »


MICHAEL BRYANT PROSECUTORS RECEIVE PRESTIGIOUS AWARD FROM DEFENCE ATTORNEYS

October 17, 2015

Mark Sandler will be this year’s recipient of the G. Arthur Martin Criminal Justice Medal for outstanding contributions to criminal justice. Richard Peck was last year’s recipient. The Award will be presented to Sandler at the Ontario Criminal Lawyers’ Association Convention on Halloween, October 31, 2015 between 1pm-3pm at the Toronto Marriot Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel. Sandler and Peck are most famous as the defence attorneys chosen to act as prosecutors in the Michael Bryant road rage case that involved his killing of Darcy Allan Sheppard.

The Ontario Criminal Lawyers Association (CLA) presents the G. Arthur Martin Criminal Justice Medal annually. Past recipients include famed defence attorneys such as John Robinette, Eddie Greenspan (Marie Henein’s mentor) and James Lockyer who founded the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted.

In his book “28 Seconds”, Michael Bryant wrote about the closeness of the Toronto criminal defence bar. He said:

“But I learned something about the criminal defence bar in Toronto. They stick together and work together to help each other, even if they’re not retained on the case. This doesn’t apply to every lawyer, but amongst those who reciprocate, there is a small group of colleagues who advance the interests of the accused, at large.”

  Read the rest of this entry »


Help support the production of Darcy Allan Sheppard documentary

June 12, 2015

Documentary to reveal evidence hidden from the public (Fund here)

On August 31,2009, former Ontario Attorney General, Michael Bryant killed Toronto bike messenger Darcy Allan Sheppard in a violent act of road rage. The killing was caught on video and witnessed by many people some of whom were standing a few feet from Bryant’s car.

After reviewing video and speaking with witnesses, Toronto police charged Bryant with with criminal negligence causing death and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death. Bryant responded by hiring PR firm Navigator and famed defence attorney Marie Henein. (Readers may remember these names as both were also hired by CBC personality and accused sexual predator, Jian Ghomeshi). Bryant claimed that his defence cost him $300,000.

Henein would later reveal that the pressure to acquit Bryant was overwhelming:

“I couldn’t get away from the legal community’s oft-expressed sentiment. The truth is that Michael Bryant was well-loved by the legal community. Many identified with him, many knew him personally, and many were utterly grief-stricken over his situation. The pressure to get the right result was, to be honest, overwhelming at times.”

 

Despite this pressure, Bryant’s former associates turned to that same legal community to find special prosecutors. Two criminal defence attorneys were brought in to prosecute the case, special prosecutor Richard Peck and his agent, Toronto criminal defence attorney Mark Sandler. After consultations with Bryant’s attorney, the prosecutors eventually dropped all charges during a court presentation that only presented evidence supporting Bryant and ignored all evidence that pointed to his guilt.

Toronto filmmakers are working to produce a documentary that will present ALL of the available evidence to the public including damning eyewitness testimony that was kept from the public.

Please help fund the documentary to bring the missing evidence into the public realm.

For more information and the complete story visit the documentary page on Indiegogo.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.